Skip to main content
Skip table of contents

2.1 Contributor Code of Conduct

This code of conduct details the expectations for contributors to Scientific Infra & Private Assets' indices and should be read in conjunction with Article 15 of the EU Benchmarks Regulation (BMR; European Parliament, 2016) and the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1645 of 13 July 2018 (European Parliament, 2018).

Both require benchmarks derived from contributed information to develop a code of conduct that specifies the contributor’s responsibilities with respect to the input data.

The code details the governance, data submission, record keeping, and data revision/error checking requirements that a contributor must follow to be included in Scientific Infra & Private Assets' indices.

Data submission and record-keeping

The required data is described in the Scientific Infra & Private Assets data collection standard. This standard details the information that the contributor must provide, the format it must take, and the periodicity of the contribution.

The contribution must be provided to a representative of Scientific Infra & Private Assets through the secure data portal, and alternate arrangements, such as contingency plans in circumstances of operational or technical difficulties, will be agreed upon prior to the submission. The contributor will submit data in the agreed and required format described in Scientific Infra & Private Assets' data standard.

The contributor will conduct the necessary reviews and validate the submission internally before providing the submission to Scientific Infra & Private Assets. Furthermore, in providing the submission it acknowledges that the information provided is complete, accurate, and consistent with the Scientific Infra & Private Assets specifications in the data standard.

Following the submission, the contributor is required to maintain records relating to the submission for a period of five (5) years, subject to applicable record-keeping requirements. Frequent and regular reviews in its systems and controls established on the contribution of data are required, at least annually.

If Scientific Infra & Private Assets requests, the contributor will provide the documents used to provide a submission. These can include but are not limited to annual reports, financial models, valuation reports, and transaction contracts.

Contributor to keep records of any disciplinary action taken against any of its employees in respect of benchmark-related activities.


The contributor is required to delegate the task of preparing the submission to an employee with sufficient experience, authority, skills and knowledge and to receive adequate and relevant training to prepare and submit the data on behalf of the contributor and receive reports on data quality subsequent to submission. The contributor is expected to perform a due diligence process to verify the submitter’s identity, qualifications and reputation, including whether the person has previously been excluded from submitting input data to a benchmark for reasons of misconduct.

The contributor is expected to develop policies and procedures that ensure that the organisation complies with this code of conduct governing the contribution process and ensures that any submission has appropriate approvals to ensure data integrity.

All parties that provide input to the submission must be identified with each submission.

Data revision or suspicious submissions

Submitters are expected to conduct internal reviews before making a submission to Scientific Infra & Private Assets. These reviews are expected to identify any errors or anomalous reports that would lead to their rejection.

All submissions are expected to provide supporting evidence if Scientific Infra & Private Assets requests when reviewing the integrity of the data.

Submitters are expected to have a robust compliance regime in place that allows for the reporting of any errors or suspicious behaviours and submissions. Any suspicious behaviour or submission must be reported to Scientific Infra & Private Assets in a timely manner upon discovery.

Use of discretion

There must be policies in place for the contributor on the use of discretion in its data submission. The contributor must ensure at least the following are established and recorded:

  • the circumstances in which the contributor may exercise discretion;

  • the employee/individual within the contributor's organisation who are permitted to exercise discretion;

  • the internal controls that regulate the exercise of the contributor's discretion in accordance with its policies;

  • the employee/individual within the contributor's organisation who is authorised to conduct an ex-post evaluation of the exercise of discretion.

Conflicts of interest

As part of a robust compliance regime, the contributor is expected to maintain effective controls to identify and manage any apparent or perceived conflicts of interest in the data submission process. These controls must include a policy that allows for employees of the contributor to raise concerns about apparent or perceived conflicts of interest without fear of retribution. Contributor to ensure that its employees involved in the submission process must be trained in all policies, procedures and controls relating to the identification, prevention and management of conflicts of interest.

The contributor is expected to establish policies governing conflict of interest and shall include the following requirements:

  • the process for identifying and managing conflicts of interest, including any internal escalation of conflicts of interest;

  • steps to prevent, or minimise the risk of, conflicts of interest in the process of recruiting submitters;

  • steps to prevent, or minimise the risk of, conflicts of interest arising from the contributor's management structure;

  • establishment of a register of conflicts of interest to be used to record any conflicts of interest identified and any measures taken to manage them, together with requirements to keep the register up-to-date and to provide internal or external auditors with access to it.

European Parliament (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016. Official Journal of the European Union.

European Parliament (2018). Commission delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1645 of 13 July 2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union.

JavaScript errors detected

Please note, these errors can depend on your browser setup.

If this problem persists, please contact our support.